An algorithmic game theory framework for bilateral bargaining with uncertainty
نویسندگان
چکیده
Bilateral bargaining is the most common economic transaction. Customarily, it is formulated as a non-cooperative game with uncertain-information and infinite actions (offers are real-value). Its automation is a long-standing open problem in artificial intelligence and no algorithmic methodology employable regardless of the kind of uncertainty is provided. In this paper, we provide the first step (with one-sided uncertainty) of an algorithmic game theory framework to solve bargaining with any kind of uncertainty. The idea behind our framework is to reduce, by analytical tools, a bargaining problem to a finite game and then to compute, by algorithmic tools, an equilibrium in this game.
منابع مشابه
Measuring the efficiency of Iranian electricity distribution companies, a combined approach to bargaining game with DEA
Many models have been proposed for measuring performance of business agencies up to now. The goal of this research is providing a new approach for evaluation and measurement of efficiencies of national power distribution companies. This approach is provided as a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Game Theory for evaluation of decision-making units by a large scale of actions. I...
متن کاملMeasuring the efficiency of Iranian electricity distribution companies, a combined approach to bargaining game with DEA
Many models have been proposed for measuring performance of business agencies up to now. The goal of this research is providing a new approach for evaluation and measurement of efficiencies of national power distribution companies. This approach is provided as a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Game Theory for evaluation of decision-making units by a large scale of actions. I...
متن کاملEquitable Risk Allocation in Construction Projects: Fuzzy Bargaining Game Approach
An equitable risk allocation between contracting parties plays a vital role in enhancing the performance of the project. This research presents a new quantitative risk allocation approach by integrating fuzzy logic and bargaining game theory. Owing to the imprecise and uncertain nature of players’ payoffs at different risk allocation strategies, fuzzy logic is implemented to determine the value...
متن کاملSolving strategic bargaining with arbitrary one-sided uncertainty
Bilateral bargaining has received a lot of attention in the multi–agent literature and has been studied with different approaches. According to the strategic approach, bargaining is modeled as a non–cooperative game with uncertain information and infinite actions. Its resolution is a long–standing open problem and no algorithm addressing uncertainty over multiple parameters is known. In this pa...
متن کاملInformation collection in bargaining
I analyze a bilateral bargaining model with one-sided uncertainty about time preferences. The uninformed player has the option of halting the bargaining process to obtain additional information, when it is his turn to offer. In general, the uninformed player does not collect information when he is quite sure about his opponent’s type. I identify preference settings in which the uninformed playe...
متن کامل